Views: 0 Author: Site Editor Publish Time: 2025-03-05 Origin: Site
In the plastic products industry, injection molds, as core production tools, have costs that directly affect the final price of products and the profit margins of enterprises. Understanding the composition and optimization methods of injection mold costs is significant for manufacturers, purchasers, and industry professionals. This article will comprehensively analyze various aspects of injection mold costs to help businesses control expenses more effectively and enhance competitiveness.
Table of Contents |
1. Basic Cost Composition |
2. Costs in the Mold Design Stage |
3. Raw Material Cost Analysis |
4. Manufacturing Processing Costs |
5. Mold Life and Maintenance Costs |
6. Analysis of Hidden Costs |
7. Cost Comparison of Different Types of Injection Molds |
8. Industry Trends and Future Outlook |
9. Conclusion |
The total cost of injection molds consists of several key elements, each occupying a different proportion of the overall cost. Thoroughly understanding these cost elements is essential for accurately assessing and effectively controlling the total cost of molds.
Mold Design Costs
Mold design is the starting point of the entire mold manufacturing process, typically accounting for 10-15% of the total cost. Design costs mainly depend on the complexity of the mold, precision requirements, and the expertise of the design team. Although a high-quality design plan may require significant upfront investment, it can effectively avoid issues in subsequent manufacturing and debugging stages, ultimately reducing total costs in the long run.
Raw Material Costs
Raw material costs usually account for 30-40% of the total mold cost and are the primary component. The selection of mold steel, standard components, and various auxiliary materials directly affects the performance and lifespan of the mold, thus impacting long-term usage costs.
Manufacturing Processing Costs
The processing phase includes multiple operations such as rough machining, finishing, and heat treatment, accounting for approximately 35-45% of the total cost. With the development of CNC technology, processing accuracy has improved, and the level of automation has increased, which somewhat mitigates the pressure from rising labor costs.
Mold Testing and Debugging Costs
Mold testing and debugging typically account for 5-10% of the total cost. This phase is crucial for ensuring mold quality, especially for high-precision and high-requirement molds. Sufficient testing and fine-tuning can significantly reduce later production issues.
Mold Acceptance and Quality Inspection Costs
The acceptance and quality inspection phase accounts for about 3-5% of the total cost. Strict quality control processes may increase upfront costs, but they effectively reduce the failure rate once the mold is put into use, extending the mold's lifespan and improving overall economic efficiency.
The mold design stage is a key part of cost control; reasonable design can optimize subsequent manufacturing processes, reduce material consumption, and improve mold performance.
Concept Design Costs
The concept design stage involves determining the mold structure scheme, including basic work such as parting line design and feed system planning. Although costs are relatively low at this stage, it has a significant impact on subsequent work. A reasonable concept design can prevent a large amount of rework later.
![]() | ![]() |
3D Modeling and Engineering Drawing Costs
3D modeling and detailed engineering drawings are typically completed by professional engineers. Based on mold complexity and precision requirements, costs range from a few thousand to tens of thousands of yuan. A complete 3D model and accurate engineering drawings are prerequisites for ensuring mold processing quality.
Mold Flow Analysis Costs
Mold flow analysis simulates the flow of plastic before mold manufacturing, predicting potential issues. Although mold flow analysis software and talent costs are high, this investment can significantly reduce the time and costs of the testing and debugging phase for complex molds or high-requirement products.
Design Modification and Optimization Costs
Design modifications and optimizations are iterative processes, especially after communication with clients or discovering issues during mold flow analysis. Each modification incurs additional costs, so effective communication and detailed planning in the early stages can significantly reduce these expenditures.
Design Software and Equipment Investment
The investment in professional CAD/CAM software licenses and high-performance computing equipment is also part of the mold design cost. Although these are one-time or periodic investments, they still constitute an important part of the design cost when allocated per mold.
Raw material costs are an important component in the manufacturing process of injection molds, directly affecting the mold's durability, processing performance, and production efficiency. By selecting and using raw materials wisely, costs can be effectively controlled while meeting product quality requirements.
Here is a detailed comparison table based on the characteristics of mold steel, including prices, lifespans, and typical application scenarios:
Steel Type | Price (10,000 yuan/ton) | Lifespan (10,000 cycles) | Usage Scenarios |
S136 | 3.2-3.8 (domestic) / 4.5-5.5 (imported) | 50-80 | Optical lenses, medical devices, transparent parts with high gloss requirements (e.g., mineral water bottle molds) |
718H | 1.8-2.2 (domestic) / 3.5-4.0 (imported) | 40-60 | Automotive interior parts, home appliance casings, ordinary electronic parts (e.g., TV casing molds) |
P20 | 1.2-1.5 (domestic) / 2.0-2.5 (imported) | 30-50 | Daily necessities molds, toys, low-precision plastic parts (e.g., plastic storage box molds) |
NAK80 | 2.5-3.0 (domestic) / 4.0-5.0 (imported) | 80-120 | Electronic product casings, mirror molds (e.g., mobile phone casings, cosmetic packaging molds) |
H13 | 1.5-1.8 (domestic) / 2.8-3.5 (imported) | 50-70 (requires coating) | Die-casting molds, plastic parts in high-temperature environments (e.g., aluminum alloy die-casting molds) |
S50C | 0.6-0.8 (domestic) | 10-20 | Simple molds, trial molds (e.g., small batch sample molds) |
Standard Component Costs
Standard components are generic parts that can be directly purchased for molds, including guide posts, guide sleeves, springs, etc. Choosing suitable quality standard components can help control costs while ensuring mold performance.
Standard Part Type | Domestic Brand Price (yuan/set) | Imported Brand Price (yuan/set) | Performance Differences |
Guide Post System | 800-1,500 | 2,000-5,000 | Imported brands have higher precision and longer service life |
Ejector Mechanism | 500-1,000 | 1,200-3,000 | Imported brands have better materials and higher stability |
Mold Temperature Control System | 1,500-4,000 | 5,000-15,000 | Imported brands have higher temperature control precision and lower energy consumption |
Auxiliary Material Costs
Auxiliary materials include various sealing components, connectors, cooling pipes, etc. Although unit prices are low, their large quantities can accumulate significant costs. Quality and price should be considered comprehensively during procurement to avoid mold failures caused by low-quality materials.
The manufacturing processing phase is a major component of mold costs, involving various processing techniques and equipment. Processing quality directly affects mold performance, while processing efficiency relates directly to mold delivery cycles.
Rough Machining Costs
Rough machining is the first step in mold manufacturing, mainly involving cutting, sawing, and milling of mold raw materials to remove excess material and form a preliminary shape.
Process Characteristics: Rough machining typically uses large milling machines, saws, or lathes, mainly pursuing efficiency without high precision.
Cost Composition: Rough machining costs mainly include equipment usage costs, tool consumption, and labor costs.
Influencing Factors: The larger the mold size and the harder the raw material, the more time and equipment wear will be incurred, leading to higher costs. For large molds, rough machining may account for about 20% of total processing costs.
![]() | ![]() |
Finishing Costs
Finishing is the core stage of mold processing, determining the final accuracy and quality of the mold. Depending on the processing method, it mainly includes CNC machining, EDM spark machining, and wire cutting.
CNC Machining
Process Characteristics: CNC (Computer Numerical Control) machining is the main method for finishing, used for processing high-precision mold components such as cores and cavities. CNC machining can meet complex surface and high-precision requirements.
Cost Composition: CNC machining costs include equipment depreciation, programming costs, tool consumption, and labor costs.
Influencing Factors: The complexity of the mold structure and precision requirements are the main influencing factors. For example, complex 3D surface machining requires higher-end CNC machines and longer processing times, thus increasing costs.
EDM Machining
Process Characteristics: EDM machining is suitable for processing complex structures and hard-to-machine areas in molds, such as deep cavities, sharp angles, and small components.
Cost Composition: EDM machining costs mainly consist of electrode materials (e.g., copper or graphite), equipment wear, and labor costs.
Influencing Factors: The complexity of the processing area, the difficulty of electrode design, and the processing depth all affect costs.
Wire Cutting
Process Characteristics: Wire cutting is used for cutting high-precision straight or curved components in molds, often used in blanking mold processing, with precision reaching ±0.002mm.
Cost Composition: Costs mainly include wire consumption (e.g., molybdenum or copper wire), equipment operating costs, and labor costs.
Influencing Factors: Processing thickness, precision requirements, and the complexity of cutting paths all affect costs.
Heat Treatment Costs
Heat treatment is an important process for improving the performance of mold steel, enhancing hardness, strength, and wear resistance.
Common Processes: Quenching, tempering, carburizing, nitriding, etc., with different heat treatment processes selected based on mold material and usage requirements.
Cost Composition: Heat treatment costs include energy costs for the heat treatment process, equipment depreciation, and size correction costs after heat treatment.
Influencing Factors: The type of mold material and heat treatment requirements (e.g., hardness level, carburizing depth) directly influence heat treatment costs. For example, high-hardness mold materials require complex multi-step heat treatment processes, resulting in relatively high costs.
Surface Treatment Costs
Surface treatment is an important step to enhance mold performance and product quality, mainly including polishing, coating treatment, and nitriding.
Polishing Costs: Polishing is used to improve the surface smoothness of molds to meet the aesthetic requirements of plastic products. Polishing costs are closely related to the complexity of the mold surface and the smoothness requirements; precise polishing is costly.
Coating Treatment Costs: To improve molds' corrosion resistance and wear resistance, some mold surfaces undergo chrome plating, nickel plating, or PVD coating treatment. Such processes are expensive but can significantly extend mold life.
Nitriding Costs: Nitriding forms a hardened layer on the mold surface, enhancing wear resistance and fatigue resistance. It is relatively low-cost and offers good cost-performance ratio as a surface treatment method.
Assembly and Debugging Costs
After mold processing is completed, assembly, debugging, and functional testing are required to ensure the mold operates normally and meets production requirements.
Assembly Costs: Mold assembly includes the installation of components, alignment of guide posts and sleeves, and adjustment of ejector mechanisms. Assembly costs are closely related to the complexity of the mold structure.
Debugging Costs: Mold debugging verifies the functionality and performance of the mold through testing and trials. The debugging process may involve multiple adjustments and repairs, increasing labor and equipment usage costs.
Cost Impact: The raw materials, electricity, and technician labor costs consumed during testing are included in the debugging costs; the more issues a mold has, the higher the debugging costs.
Mold lifespan and maintenance costs are long-term investments in the total cost of injection molds, directly affecting the efficiency of mold use and production costs. During mold usage, reasonable assessment, maintenance, and repair plans are essential for extending mold life and reducing production interruption risks. The following analyzes mold lifespan and maintenance costs from several aspects.
Mold Life Expectancy Assessment
Mold life is usually measured by the number of cycles it can complete, depending on mold material, design quality, processing precision, and usage conditions.
Relationship Between Lifespan and Material: The choice of mold steel has a decisive impact on lifespan. For example, molds made from P20 steel typically last for 300,000 to 500,000 cycles, while those made from 718 or H13 steel can last up to 500,000 to 1,000,000 cycles or more. High-performance materials have higher initial costs, but their wear resistance and fatigue resistance can significantly extend mold life.
Relationship Between Lifespan and Design: Reasonable mold design can reduce stress concentration and wear, extending the mold's lifespan. Additionally, optimizing the design of cooling and lubrication systems can reduce thermal fatigue and friction loss during mold operation.
Significance of Lifespan Assessment: Accurately assessing a mold's expected lifespan helps develop reasonable production plans and maintenance cycles, thereby reducing the overall operating costs of the mold.
Regular Maintenance Costs
Regular maintenance is an important measure for extending mold life. Through daily cleaning, lubrication, and inspection, molds can be prevented from premature scrapping due to excessive wear or accidental damage.
Maintenance Content: Regular cleaning of mold cavities and cores, inspecting the wear of guide posts and sleeves, timely replacing lubricants and coolants, and ensuring all mold components operate normally.
Maintenance Cycle: The maintenance cycle should be determined based on the usage frequency and production conditions of the mold. For example, molds in high-intensity production environments require more frequent inspections and maintenance.
Maintenance Costs: Maintenance expenses mainly include labor costs, consumption of lubricants and cleaners, and equipment usage fees. Although maintenance costs increase short-term expenditures, they significantly reduce unplanned downtime and repair costs, making them a necessary and economical investment in the long run.
Mold Repair and Refurbishment Costs
During use, molds may require repair or refurbishment due to wear, deformation, or accidental damage. The cost of repairs depends on the degree of damage and the repair process.
Common Repair Work: This includes polishing cavity surfaces, replacing guide posts, repairing ejector pins, and welding repairs. Minor wear can be addressed with simple polishing or adjustments, while severe damage may require reprocessing or part replacement.
Repair and Refurbishment Costs:
Minor repairs (e.g., polishing, lubrication): Relatively low cost, usually within the maintenance budget.
Major repairs (e.g., welding repairs, part replacement): Higher costs, especially for high-precision parts requiring specialized equipment and technicians.
Refurbishment Costs: When a mold reaches the end of its useful life or is severely damaged, refurbishment may be preferred over remanufacturing. Refurbishment costs typically range from 30-50% of the cost of manufacturing a new mold but can restore some functionality and lifespan, making it an economical choice.
Spare Parts Inventory Investment
To reduce downtime caused by mold damage, companies typically reserve necessary spare parts, such as guide posts, guide sleeves, ejector pins, and springs.
Types of Spare Parts:
Standard Parts: For example, guide posts, sleeves, springs, etc., these components are prone to wear and frequently replaced, with lower costs, making them suitable for advance reservation.
Customized Parts: Such as special cavity components or complex cooling system parts, these components require longer processing times and higher costs, often needing to be reserved in batches based on actual demand.
Inventory Costs: Spare parts inventory costs include procurement costs and inventory management expenses. Although inventory costs increase the company's capital occupation, they effectively reduce losses caused by shortages of spare parts.
In the manufacturing of injection molds, in addition to explicit costs (such as raw materials and processing costs), there are many hidden costs. These hidden costs are often difficult to quantify directly but can have a profound impact on the overall costs and project benefits of the enterprise. Here is an analysis of common hidden costs in injection molds:
Additional Costs from Mold Design Changes
Mold design changes are a common source of hidden costs in the mold manufacturing process, often caused by adjustments in customer requirements, design flaws, or poor communication.
Causes:
Changes in customer requirements, such as adjustments in product structure or added functions.
Initial design flaws not identified in a timely manner, necessitating subsequent adjustments to the mold design.
Insufficient understanding of customer requirements by designers, resulting in plans that do not meet expectations.
Manifestations of Hidden Costs:
Mold design changes may require redoing 3D modeling, mold flow analysis, or even adjustments to the processing plan, increasing design time and labor costs.
Completed machined parts may become scrap, wasting materials and labor.
Solutions: Strengthen communication with clients during the design phase, rigorously review design plans, and use simulation analysis tools (such as Moldflow) to identify potential issues early, reducing the frequency of design changes.
Costs Due to Delivery Delays
Delays in the mold manufacturing cycle not only affect the client's production schedule but may also lead to additional economic losses for the enterprise.
Causes:
Insufficient coordination between design and processing stages, leading to extended timelines.
Supply chain issues (e.g., delays in raw material arrival).
Failed trials or prolonged mold repairs.
Manifestations of Hidden Costs:
Disruption of the client’s production schedule may lead to compensation claims or order cancellations.
Reduced utilization of the enterprise's production resources, with increased operational costs due to idle equipment.
In the long term, decreased client trust in the enterprise may affect future cooperation opportunities.
Solutions: Establish a comprehensive project management system, optimize production scheduling, ensure supply chain stability, and leave a buffer period for delivery.
Rework Costs Due to Quality Issues
Quality issues with molds are a significant source of hidden costs, including defects in the molds themselves as well as product quality problems caused by mold issues.
Causes:
Insufficient machining accuracy, causing molds to fail to meet design requirements.
Discovery of defects in the mold during testing, such as flash, shrinkage, warping, etc.
Early wear or damage to molds during use, affecting product quality.
Manifestations of Hidden Costs:
Repairing molds requires additional labor, equipment, and material investments.
Mold issues leading to non-conforming products can halt production lines or necessitate re-manufacturing.
Damage to the enterprise's reputation may result in loss of client trust.
Solutions: Improve mold manufacturing precision and quality control standards, strictly execute inspection processes at every stage to reduce rework chances.
Intellectual Property Protection Costs
Mold manufacturing involves a significant amount of technology and design schemes, and the costs associated with intellectual property protection are another often-overlooked hidden cost.
Causes:
Companies need to protect their mold designs, process flows, and technological innovations from being copied or stolen by competitors.
Clients may require protection for the patented designs of customized molds, which incurs costs for the companies.
Manifestation of Hidden Costs:
Intellectual property protection requires the application for patents, trademark registration, or the signing of confidentiality agreements, all of which involve legal fees and time costs.
Inadequate protection of intellectual property may lead to technology leaks, exposing companies to competitive threats.
Solutions:
Strengthen awareness of intellectual property, sign confidentiality agreements with clients, and apply for patent protection when necessary. Additionally, ensure the internal management security of design documents and technical materials.
The costs of injection molds vary significantly based on their structure, function, and application scenarios. Single-cavity molds, multi-cavity molds, hot runner molds, cold runner molds, precision molds, as well as large or small molds each have different cost compositions and suitable applications. Below is a detailed analysis of the cost differences among various types of injection molds:
Mold Type | Cost Composition | Price Comparison | Applicable Scenarios | Advantages and Disadvantages | Case Data |
Single-Cavity | • Low initial cost (simple structure) | Price: 50,000-150,000 | Small batch (<100,000 pcs) | Pros: Quick development, low investment Cons: Low efficiency, high per unit cost | Daily necessities mold (single-cavity): - Initial cost: 80,000 - Per unit cost: 0.5 yuan/pc |
Multi-Cavity | • High initial cost (multi-cavity processing) | Price: 200,000-1,000,000 | Large batch (>500,000 pcs) | Pros: High mass production efficiency Cons: Complex design, long debugging cycle | Bottle cap mold (1 out of 32 cavities): - Initial cost: 650,000 - Per unit cost: 0.03 yuan/pc |
Hot Runner | • High mold cost (complex system) • High maintenance cost<br>• Low material waste | 40%-80% higher than cold runner | High value-added, long cycle production | Pros: No material waste, fast forming Cons: Strict temperature control required | Automotive lampshade mold: - Hot runner system cost: 120,000 - Annual material cost savings: 180,000 |
Cold Runner | • Low mold cost • High material waste (material waste ratio 15%-30%) | 30%-60% lower price | Short-term orders, low-cost products | Pros: Simple structure, easy maintenance Cons: High waste, long cycle | Toy mold (cold runner): - Initial cost: 100,000 - Material waste cost ratio: 22% |
Simple Mold | • Low material cost (aluminum/soft steel) • Low processing cost (mainly rough processing) | Price: 30,000-150,000 | Sample validation/small batch trial production | Pros: Quick delivery (7-15 days) Cons: Short lifespan (<50,000 cycles) | Appliance trial mold (aluminum mold): - Cost: 60,000 - Lifespan: 20,000 cycles |
Precision Mold | • High material cost (hard alloy) • Processing cost accounts for 60% (mirror EDM/5-axis machining) | Price: 300,000-3,000,000 | High precision parts (±0.005mm) | Pros: Long lifespan (>1,000,000 cycles) Cons: Long development cycle (3-6 months) | Connector mold: - Cost: 1,200,000 - Lifespan: 1,500,000 cycles |
Large Mold | • High material ratio (>50%) • Requires large processing equipment | Price: 500,000-5,000,000 | Automotive/home appliance components | Pros: Large single forming area Cons: High debugging risk (repair costs can reach 30%) | Automotive bumper mold: - Size: 2.5m×1.2m - Material cost ratio: 58% |
Small Mold | • High processing cost ratio (>65%) • Compact mold structure | Price: 50,000-500,000 | Electronic components/precision parts | Pros: Flexible adaptation to multi-cavity design Cons: High precision requirements (time-consuming processing) | Mobile phone button mold: - Processing cost ratio: 72% - Tolerance: ±0.003mm |
With technological advancements and market changes, the injection mold industry is undergoing profound transformations. Understanding these trends helps companies formulate forward-looking cost management strategies.
Impact of New Technologies on Mold Costs
Application and Cost of 3D Printing Technology in Mold Manufacturing: 3D printing technology is being increasingly applied in mold manufacturing, especially for the production of complex cooling channels and rapid prototyping of cavity shapes. Although the current costs of 3D printing equipment and materials are high, its advantages in shortening development cycles and optimizing cooling systems are significant, potentially saving 15-30% of manufacturing time for complex molds.
Impact of Digital Production on Mold Costs: Digital production significantly enhances mold utilization efficiency and lifespan by monitoring mold operating conditions in real time and predicting maintenance needs. Although the initial investment in digital transformation is substantial, the long-term economic benefits are significant through reduced downtime and extended mold lifespan.
Impact of Global Supply Chain Changes on Mold Costs: The restructuring of global supply chains is altering the landscape of mold manufacturing. On one hand, the return of manufacturing to developed countries is driving the demand for high-end molds. On the other hand, the enhancement of local manufacturing capabilities in emerging markets intensifies competition for mid- to low-end molds. Companies should adjust their procurement and production strategies according to their positioning to optimize cost structures.
Cost management for injection molds is a systematic project that involves multiple aspects, including design, materials, manufacturing, and maintenance. In today's increasingly competitive market, companies need to comprehensively review their mold cost structure and adopt comprehensive optimization strategies to control costs while ensuring quality and enhancing competitiveness. Looking ahead, as new technologies are continually applied and industry dynamics change, mold cost management will face new challenges and opportunities. Companies should maintain keen market insights, continuously adjust and optimize cost strategies, and seize development opportunities amid transformation.